Le 4 déc. 2012 à 12:20, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On 04/12/12 07:18, François-Paul Servant wrote: >> Andy, >> >>> Could you raise a JIRA for this? And if you have a patch, submit that as >>> well? There's another problem, with model.listStatements(s,p,o,null), which behaves as model.listStatements(s,p,o,"") (when o != null) I created one JIRA for both (and proposed a patch) Best Regards, fps >> >> I'll do - but I have no time before Friday. > > As far as I can see, e.g. the code style in that area, it's been that way > since the year dot, so Friday is just fine! > > Andy > >> >> Best, >> >> fps >> >> Le 3 déc. 2012 à 22:58, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >>> On 28/11/12 23:23, François-Paul Servant wrote: >>>> import org.junit.Test; >>>> import com.hp.hpl.jena.rdf.model.*; >>>> >>>> public class LstStmt { >>>> @Test >>>> public final void test() { >>>> Model m = ModelFactory.createDefaultModel(); >>>> Resource s = m.createResource("http://www.a.com/s";); >>>> Property p = m.createProperty("http://www.a.com/p";); >>>> Property o = m.createProperty("http://www.a.com/o";); >>>> m.add(s,p,o); >>>> m.add(s,p,"texte","fr"); >>>> m.add(s,p,"text","en"); >>>> >>>> StmtIterator it = m.listStatements(s, p, null,"fr"); >>>> // display the 3 statements >>>> for (;it.hasNext();) { >>>> System.out.println(it.next()); >>>> } >>>> } >>>> } >>> >>> Bizarre. The code does not filter as you (and I) expected. >>> >>> Could you raise a JIRA for this? And if you have a patch, submit that as >>> well? >>> >>> While it is technically a change to the formal API, your expectation seems >>> entirely intuitive. >>> >>> Small issue of whether case should matter and whether a filter of "en" >>> matches "en-UK" (c.f. SPARQL LANGMATCHES) but for the API, at least exact >>> match seems reasonable to me. >>> >>> Andy >>> >> >
