Is it ok to report bugs here? I just downloaded the release candidate to try and see if it solves an issue we're having. It does not.
In SDB, when we try to delete a named graph, it does not delete it. It seems to make a switch from named graph to default graph and try to delete the triples there. I tried to debug what happened. In the class DatasetGraph line 165 it explicitly converts triples to quads using the default graph uri. I suspect this is wrong, as it tracked the graph uri up till this point. When debugging I also had a suspicion that in SDB the triples are deleted one by one when deleting a whole graph. Is this true? Because I would think it is much more efficient to do a "delete where graph = :graph" instead. I hope I'm wrong on this. In a previous version of TDB I recently mentioned a bug where disk space is not freed when named graphs are deleted. Is this solved by any chance in this release candidate? It is too much work for me to switch back just to try it at this moment. Could SDB also be added to the aggregated build? Jeroen 2013/2/12 Adrian Gschwend <[email protected]> > On 12.02.13 14:11, Claude Warren wrote: > > > Is that information on a webpage somewhere? I'd like to be able to point > > to it in any posts. > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jena-users/201302.mbox/%3C511A076A.2030907%40apache.org%3E > > :-D > > cu > > Adrian >
