On 05/08/13 14:15, Martin Vassilev wrote:
Hi all,

I would like to ask you a few questions about Jena.

I read in the documentation that
*Note:* Although OWL version 1.1 is now a W3C recommendation, Jena's
support for OWL 1.1 features is limited

I assume you mean OWL 2, if I recall correctly that was called OWL 1.1 for a while before the full extent of the changes were apparent.

1. Can you tell me what exactly is not supported (or what is supported)
from the OWL 1.1 and what version of OWL is fully supported.

Jena provides convenience methods for the complete OWL 1 language. It provides built in rule based inference for subsets of the OWL full dialect of OWL 1 as described in [1]. Third party tools like Pellet provide complete OWL DL implementations compatible with Jena.

Jena currently has no direct support for any of the OWL 2 extensions beyond OWL 1. However, since OWL 2 can be fully encoded in RDF (the normative syntax) and Jena can handle any RDF, then you can read and write any OWL 2 ontology, you just need to do a little more work. Certainly people have build commercial OWL 2 tools on top of Jena.

There is no built in inference support for any of OWL 2 beyond OWL 1. To find out exactly what Pellet et all provide for OWL 2 you would need to check with them directly.

2. Can Jena handle 2 or 3 billions of triples using TDB.

It depends.

There is no hard limit on TDB size around there so with a big enough machine you should be able to load that. It is pushing the sizes where things can get slow though. So whether query performance will be adequate for you will depend on your data, your queries and your machine. The only way to be sure is to try it.

3. Is it possible to switch TDB with SDB relatively easy ?

Relatively but SDB is not advised for new projects unless you have a strong need for it and I very much doubt it would cope with 2-3bT.

Dave

[1] http://jena.apache.org/documentation/inference/#owl

Reply via email to