Thanks all for helping me out! I totally agree with you. 

But, is there a strong argument (backed by a standard, for example, or a 
recommendation from a standard body ...) supporting this opinion that can be 
used in argumentation?

Milorad





>________________________________
> From: Olivier Rossel <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 10:47 AM
>Subject: Re: best practice in assigning URIs to individuals
> 
>
>Michale s answer can be illustrated when setting up URI derefencing.
>I.e when people can "access" your resource via HTTP.
>To achieve that, your URIs are mapped to URLs in your IT infrastructure.
>This is technically possible only if the namespace of your URIs maps with
>your domain name
>and website structure.
>So, in short: use your own namespace (and define it according to your IT if
>you want URI dereferencing :)
>
>
>
>On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Michael Brunnbauer <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello Milorad,
>>
>> you should not create URIs in other peoples namespaces without their
>> permission.
>>
>> So best practice would be "d1:R rdf:type d2:C2".
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Michael Brunnbauer
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:00:27PM -0700, Milorad Tosic wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > The question may be somewhat out of focus of the group but since we have
>> here a number of competent people I dared to post the question here.
>> >
>> >
>> > Let us given an ontology O1 under development that has assigned domain
>> "d1:". So, we have ownership of O1. For development of the O1 we find
>> useful to use some knowledge defined in an ontology O2 with domain "d2:".
>> Note that the O2 is an externally defined ontology not in our
>> administration scope. Let's now assume we want to create a resource that
>> would be an individual from the class "d2:C", where the class is defined in
>> O2.
>> >
>> > What should be best practice to do: "d1:R rdf:type d2:C2" or "d2:R
>> rdf:type d2:C2"?
>> >
>> > I believe both are conceptually correct statements but I am not sure
>> whether the second statement is in accordance with Linked Data principles.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Milorad Tosic
>>
>> --
>> ++  Michael Brunnbauer
>> ++  netEstate GmbH
>> ++  Geisenhausener Straße 11a
>> ++  81379 München
>> ++  Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80
>> ++  Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89
>> ++  E-Mail [email protected]
>> ++  http://www.netestate.de/
>> ++
>> ++  Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München)
>> ++  USt-IdNr. DE221033342
>> ++  Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer
>> ++  Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel
>>
>
>

Reply via email to