You might try the Openshift free option [1]. I have not used used it with Fuseki [2] but have used it successfully for other small java based projects.
Regards /Andy [1] https://www.openshift.com/products/online [2] https://github.com/semfact/openshift-fuseki On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22/08/13 17:00, Danny Ayers wrote: > >> Mostly through economic necessity, I finally got around to playing with >> the >> G thing. As far as I can tell it should be possible to host instances of >> Fuseki there (for free for a big starters, only $$$ if you start really >> hitting the bandwidth/processing). Had to jump through a few silly hoops >> (client issues - it's only Ubuntu, man) to get basic Python stuff going, >> but the info is online. >> >> Lazy says I don't repeat other's work. Found a thread [1] about packaging >> Fuseki as a WAR, but it's inconclusive. Latest? Suggestions? >> >> It could be a nice one, only the other day someone was asking how much an >> endpoint costs. Does beg the question how you'd pay for it, if people >> found >> it useful. Would like to know how much dbPedia has cost so far. But >> hosting >> a vocab or a handful of triples (call it blog, links and hashes of cat >> photos) shouldn't stretch. >> >> Cheers, >> Danny. >> >> [1] >> http://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/jena-dev/201208.** >> mbox/%3C1814529765.22594.**1346425028681.JavaMail.**jiratomcat@arcas%3E<http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jena-dev/201208.mbox/%3C1814529765.22594.1346425028681.JavaMail.jiratomcat@arcas%3E> >> >> > Hi Danny, > > As I recall, the state of JENA-201 is that the example patch puts the > configuration file inside the WAR file. That's OK sometimes but it means > the user has "some assembly required" and they have to put the WAR file > together. > > I'd really like to see a fixed binary WAR file that the Jena project > provides. That needs finding the configuration file outside the WAR file > -- this is necessary for using TDB as well because the database can't be > inside the WAR file. > > I guess we need to snaffle part of the file space like: > > /usr/share/fuseki > > for config file, any static pages and database files. > > (or maybe a list of locations, and then the code plays "hunt the file > area" game on startup) > > I'm not an expert in the current correct filesystem layouts for systems > (anyone got any advice? And for windows?) > > Is having TDB DB files on the same area as the Fuseki config file and > static pages a good thing or a bad thing? > > Andy > >
