On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22/09/13 15:41, Marco Neumann wrote: >> >> had to rename the static *.owl files to *.rdf and now the bulk load >> works just fine with tdbloader2 (apache-jena-2.11.0) >> >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Marco Neumann <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> get the following tdbloader2 exception now with all my RDF/XML files >>> on apache-jena-2.11.0 >>> >>> INFO Load: lotico.owl -- 2013/09/22 13:59:02 UTC >>> ERROR [line: 3, col: 1 ] Broken IRI (newline): rdf:RDF >>> xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"; >>> org.apache.jena.riot.RiotException: [line: 3, col: 1 ] Broken IRI >>> (newline): rdf:RDF >>> xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"; >>> at >>> org.apache.jena.riot.system.ErrorHandlerFactory$ErrorHandlerStd.fatal(ErrorHandlerFactory.java:136) >>> at >>> org.apache.jena.riot.lang.LangEngine.raiseException(LangEngine.java:163) >>> at >>> org.apache.jena.riot.lang.LangEngine.nextToken(LangEngine.java:106) >>> at >>> org.apache.jena.riot.lang.LangNTriples.parseOne(LangNTriples.java:63) >>> at >>> org.apache.jena.riot.lang.LangNTriples.runParser(LangNTriples.java:54) >>> at org.apache.jena.riot.lang.LangBase.parse(LangBase.java:42) >>> at org.apache.jena.riot.RiotReader.parse(RiotReader.java:116) >>> at org.apache.jena.riot.RiotReader.parse(RiotReader.java:93) >>> at org.apache.jena.riot.RiotReader.parse(RiotReader.java:66) >>> at >>> com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.store.bulkloader2.CmdNodeTableBuilder.exec(CmdNodeTableBuilder.java:163) >>> at arq.cmdline.CmdMain.mainMethod(CmdMain.java:101) >>> at arq.cmdline.CmdMain.mainRun(CmdMain.java:63) >>> at arq.cmdline.CmdMain.mainRun(CmdMain.java:50) >>> at >>> com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.store.bulkloader2.CmdNodeTableBuilder.main(CmdNodeTableBuilder.java:81) >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> --- >>> Marco Neumann >>> KONA >> >> >> >> > > I'm happy to go with whatever is the community decision here - should ".owl" > default to assuming RDF/XML?
neither am I, maybe time to phase out the owl extension. in what serialization does jena read the owl file in my example? > There is no formal definition of ".owl". It is mentioned in OWL1 but not in > OWL2. if it is used I think we should assume a RDF/XML serialization > This came about from > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jena-users/201308.mbox/%3C52169A5B.4060902%40knublauch.com%3E > I share Holgers concerns here but would not go along with the assumption to find a ttl serialization in an .owl file. > but reviewing that it could be the initial analysis was wrong as the report > was expanded upon over several rounds of email. > > Adding .owl in as a default extension to mean RDF/XML does not break any of > the tests. > > Andy > this might be a good solution until the community has come to some consensus on file extensions. let me say thank you to the entire team for the new release. well done! -- --- Marco Neumann KONA
