@Claude, would be cool if you can share your test results with the community.
Lets take it from there. Thanks, Ashish On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Claude Warren <[email protected]> wrote: > I did have them testing against the new-test graph contract tests. > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 15/01/14 02:18, ashish nijhara wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> We recently upgraded our Jena release to Jena 2.10.1. We noticed a > couple > >> of deprecated APIs like some graphs under : *com.hpl.jena.graph.compose > >> *and > >> the* BulkUpdateHandler interface *(the methods inside the interface*).* > >> > >> *BulkUpdateHandler *has an alternative migration path. This information > is > >> helpful clearly. :) > >> > >> Is there any migration path for the Graphs under > >> *com.hpl.jena.graph.compose > >> *package? Any information on why these graphs were deprecated would be > >> nice. Was JENA-59 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-59> the > >> reason? > >> > >> We have recently started using the graphs from this package and find > them > >> quite useful in our algorithm, however we are just using the default > >> implementation. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ashish > >> > >> > > You mean Delta, Difference and Intersection? > > > > Looks like JENA-59 - a report from SourceForge days that the graphs were > > not acting as expected. > > > > """ > > (and classes deprecated as it seems they are poorly tested and not used > > within Jena - feedback welcome) > > """ > > > > so what is needed is for them to be tested properly against the graph > > contract, and any additional contracts those graphs might imply. > > > > Would you like to have a go at that? > > > > Andy > > > > > > > -- > I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web< > http://like-like.xenei.com> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren >
