Should we change version numbers when Java 6 is dropped?

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Rob Vesse <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes I can call a vote, what I will likely propose is that we do one more
> release that is Java 6 and then drop Java 6 support for subsequent releases
>
> Rob
>
> On 19/04/2014 09:11, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Rob,
> >
> >Do you want to call a VOTE on this?
> >
> >Then Jena 2.12.0?
> >
> >       Andy
> >
> >On 31/03/14 11:36, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >> On 31/03/14 10:34, Rob Vesse wrote:
> >>> Hi All
> >>>
> >>> Andy raised an interesting point recently that historically the Jena
> >>> project
> >>> has only guaranteed to maintain compatibility with the 2 most recent
> >>> versions of Java.  As of the recent Java 8 release this means that
> >>> Java 6 is
> >>> technically now outside of the range of versions that we intend to
> >>> maintain
> >>> compatibility with.
> >>>
> >>> Dropping of Java 6 support is not going to happen overnight so this
> >>> email is
> >>> intended to serve as advance notice that this will happen at some
> >>> point in
> >>> the future and to request feedback on this.  Note that it is likely
> >>> that in
> >>> the short term code will remain Java 6 compatible and so a workaround
> >>> after
> >>> Java 6 support is dropped will be to build from source yourself
> >>>
> >>> Are there people out there who are currently reliant on Java 6 and
> >>>cannot
> >>> move to Java 7/8 for whatever reason?  If so what sort of timescale
> >>>would
> >>> you consider reasonable for dropping Java 6 support?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your feedback,
> >>>
> >>> Rob
> >>
> >> This whole version thing is a bit of wobbly tower of choices from the
> >> top down.
> >>
> >> Fuseki2 requires Java7 because the version of Jetty (v9) it uses for the
> >> standalone server requires Java7 (which in turn is because the version
> >> of the servletAPI is "Servlet 3.0+").
> >>
> >> As it is Java7, there is use of "Files" and "Path" which are quite
> >>useful.
> >>
> >> It does not oblige the Jena libraries to be Java7.
> >>
> >>      Andy
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren

Reply via email to