Hi all,

it shall be really kind if someone might have a look into my following matching issue:

I am trying to filter out a language-specific XMLLiteral using SPARQL, cannot get the literals language property matched by the filter – and don't have a clue why so.

Any suggestions welcome !!

This is the RDF.

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=     "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#";

         xmlns:rdfs=    "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#";

         xmlns:xsd=     "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#";

         xmlns:xliff=   "urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:document:1.2"

         xmlns:timed=   "http://namespaces.semaworx.org/timed#";

            >

<rdf:Description rdf:about=       
"http://resources.semaworx.eu/timed/elements/contentincrediblyuniqueid003";>

<rdf:type     rdf:resource=    
"http://namespaces.semaworx.org/timed#versionedPayload"; />

<xliff:target rdf:parseType="Literal" xml:lang="de-de"><i18n21:message 
key="cityAPI_teaser_subhead">Airlines, Kneipen, U-Bahn, Coffee Shops, Beauty-Stores, Heimdekor-Läden,

Sportveranstaltungen&#8230;</i18n21:message></xliff:target>

</rdf:Description>


And this the SPARQL trying to match the literal as a whole:

PREFIX rdf:<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
PREFIX rdfs:<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
PREFIX xsd:<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>
PREFIX timed:<http://namespaces.semaworx.org/timed#>
PREFIX xliff:<urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:document:1.2>

CONSTRUCT{

?versionPayload rdf:type timed:versionedPayload .

?versionPayload xliff:target ?nationalString .

}

WHERE{

?versionPayload rdf:type timed:versionedPayload .

?versionPayload xliff:target ?nationalString .

FILTER ( isLiteral(?nationalString) && langMatches( lang(?nationalString), 
"de-de" ) )

}


The query as above delivers no result at all.

Despite that, besides the language-matching, the rest of the query appers to work properly:

As soon as I remove the language filter, I get a proper result; though including matching XMLLiterals for *all* available languages – which of course is not intended.


What am I missing !??

– Bardo

Reply via email to