Thank you for sorting this out for me. I am indeed interested in fuseki2. How do I get a copy of the .war file to play with?
-----Original Message----- From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, 13 October 2014 3:13 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Anyone had success with Fuseki on Openshift? On 12/10/14 14:50, baran_H wrote: > On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 15:25:44 +0200, John A. Fereira > <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm not familiar with Openshift but in order to figure out what the >> problem might be we'll need to know what version of Fuseki is being >> used and see a copy of the configuration file. Just a shot in the >> dark, but it sounds like it could be related to the configuration and >> the use of defaultUnionGraph. >> >> We've been using fuseki for a couple of years in a production >> environment and it's worked well for us. > > not that i thought that something is wrong with Fuseki or Openshift is > a production environment, but can you give me a link and a > sample-query string, am a bit curious, that is all.. > > thanks, baran John has identified the issue. It's running with defaultUnionGraph -- updates will go into the real default graph, but be invisible to the query default graph. How do I know? I tried: SELECT * { GRAPH <urn:x-arq:DefaultGraph> { ?s ?p ?o } } LIMIT 1 and got a result row. The real, storage default graph as a pseudo URI (not included as a named graph) so you can get to the storage default graph even with It's running version 0.2.7 -------------------- David - you may be interested in Fuseki2. It has security; there is a much better UI; there is a WAR file so you have more deployment options. http://jena.staging.apache.org/documentation/fuseki2/ (NB - this is the documentation staging site). Andy
