the reasoner question is key. i have some little exp. on both OWLapi and Jena.
I have found both rather easy to follow.. OWL Api does have some neat examples to follow about when managing .owl files.. loading data to the ontology, managing attributes and so on.. Jena also provides a good way to manages resoners and SPARQL queries.. =) so, do you know exactly what is it you want to work on this large file? Paulo 2014-10-14 4:48 GMT-05:00 Ashish Nijhara <[email protected]>: > With or without a reasoner? > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Benjamin Eckstein <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello folks, > > > > i know its a mean question. but has anyone experience in OWL API ( > > http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/) and can give me some feedback? > > > > if i am using OWL ontology and a lot of data (more than 1GB RAW Data) > which > > will be better at performance and avoiding out of memory errors? > > > > I like the documenation of jena a lot, but WLAPI provides testcases that > > are also usefull to quickly advance in learning the framework. > > > > thank you in advance, > > Ben > > >
