Do any
of you remember why the current interfaces were named like this so that
we now have this mismatch?

One other datum:

In RDF/XML, there is: [1],[2]

for URIs
    rdf:resource="http://.....";

for blank nodes:
    rdf:parseType="Resource"

and text language like:
"a resource has multiple property elements"

so usage of 'resource' not as in 'resource identifier' but referring to syntax used to exist but this has changed over time. RDF/XML still has hints of older usage.

        Andy

[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#section-Syntax-empty-property-elements
[2]
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#section-Syntax-parsetype-resource

Reply via email to