Yes, our company has an old project built on it. So if Jena 2.6.x does not support n-quads then i can convince my managers to move to Jena 2.13.0. Else unfortunately i have to stick to jena 2.6.4
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> wrote: > We generally recommend using the latest Jena, which now is 2.13.0. > > See http://jena.apache.org/download/ > > Is there any particular reason why you are considering using 2.6.4? > On 3 Apr 2015 17:10, "Rose Beck" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I downloaded Jena 2.6.4 today but I was not able to load n-quads in >> it. Can you please confirm if Jena 2.6.4 had N-Quad feature? This will >> help me figure out if I am going wrong somewhere >> >> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 03/04/15 08:09, Rose Beck wrote: >> >> >> >> Just out of curiosity what is difference between Jena's version "before >> >> Apache" like Jena 2.6.4 and "After Apache". Is it something to do with >> >> its ability to >> >> handle n-quads..I mean were quad stores introduced before Apache or >> >> were they introduced After Apache. >> >> >> > >> > There was no formal feature jump from 2.6.x to 2.7.x which is the >> > SourceForge->Apache migration. >> > >> > N-quads, SPARQL 1.1 finalization, and the new, efficient I/O handing in >> RIOT >> > (so syntaxes except RDF/XML (and TriX)), was happening from about that >> time >> > and later but just in parallel development. >> > >> > Andy >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> With Warm Regards, >> Rose >> -- With Warm Regards, Rose
