On 26/05/15 23:51, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
Thanks. That does not seem to be available in Jena 2.11.0 though.
No - it was added as part of being tidy when adding all the RDF 1.1
support. Ditto dtLangString.
Out of curiosity, why do you explicitly check for RDF XMLLiterals?
I've been wondering [1] if Jena ought to be less enforcing. Not
exclusive canonicalization for example. Much of this is removing the
odd API calls that have a "boolean wellFormed" flag. In Turtle,
rdf:XMLLIterals already do behave like any other literal.
RDF 1.1 downplays rdf:XMLLiterals [2] making them just another datatype,
when not in RDF/XML. In RDF/XML they are built-in.
Your thoughts?
Andy
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-815
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-XMLLiteral
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
On 26/05/15 15:38, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
Hey,
is there a better way than
import com.hp.hpl.jena.datatypes.xsd.impl.XMLLiteralType;
...
if (!stmt.getObject().isLiteral() ||
!stmt.getLiteral().getDatatype().equals(XMLLiteralType.theXMLLiteralType))
RDF.dtXMLLiteral is a little nicer than poking around the implementation
class to get
theXMLLiteralType.
Andy
?
Thanks,
Martynas
graphityhq.com
