Hi Andy, thank you for the explanation. That is new information for us since you told us that Virtuoso is an old one. We were always researching about triple stores which are promising a high performance and high scalability. Several benchmarktests were always praising Virtuoso on single servers and on distributed systems. Which solution could you offer at the moment which fulfills both requirements performance and scalability? You also said that we could use VirtDataSource and then any backend as a service inside the assembler of Fuseki would this be then in combination with Jenas SDB which isn't supported anymore?
> On May 31, 2015, at 8:57 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 31/05/15 15:52, John A. Fereira wrote: >> I've used that driver with another semantic web application that has a >> configurable triple store but not with fuseki directly. Be aware that you >> may encounter some sparql syntax difference for inserts/deletes. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Nauman Ramzan [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 9:40 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Use fuseki2 and virtuoso 7 together. >> >> Hi all ! >> I am using fuseki 2 and I want to use virtuoso 7 for store triples. >> Here is Jdbc driver for jena. https://github.com/srdc/virt-jena I want to >> load this driver in fuseki using fuseki config.ttl file. >> Thanks > > Hi, > > There are a number of possibilities: using JDBC is just one of them. Fuseki > is more setup to handle models and datasets fro the backend provider. > > (it needs you to write some code to use a JDBC connection to a backend > virtuoso instance at the moment). > > OpenLink's VirtDataSource or VirtModel together with an assembler to add it > as a service to Fuseki might be an easier way to go. Vistuos may provide > that (as their code is GPL2, Jena isn't going to provide linkage). > Unfortunately, all the virtuoso looks to be several years old. > > Finally, you can connect direct to virtuoso using SPARQL (no Fuseki > required). Then you will have to be careful about syntax of SPARQL. > > Do let this list know how you get on. > > Andy
