the Data Cube Vocabulary (http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/) indicates that it can be used for time series data.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) <[email protected]> wrote: > Very usefull, thx!! > > (also having many discussions on this in NL: should we use quads or is > semantics too unclear yet? (ref.). If reification how to keep all > redundancy in sync, etc.) > > Ref http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-datasets/ > > > > Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms > Sr. Research Scientist > Structural Reliability > T +31 (0)88 866 31 07 > M +31 (0)63 038 12 20 > E [email protected] > > This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you > are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you > are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no > liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use > it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the > electronic transmission of messages. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Hernández [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: donderdag 27 augustus 2015 18:59 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Time Series Data Modeling in RDF > > Hey Patrick, Maybe you could be interested in an experimental work that we > do testing the performance of several of this reification approaches with > Wikidata. Our work will be presented in the Workshop on Scalable Semantic > Web Knowledge Bases Systems. You can read our results here: > > http://users.dcc.uchile.cl/~dhernand/research/ssws-2015-reifying.pdf > > Cheers, > Daniel Hernández > > On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 15:11 +0000, Patrick Hoeffel wrote: > > All, > > > > I know this is not a new topic, so hopefully there is a reference to > > the de-facto standard answer on this (that I have not been able to > > find on my own so far). > > > > When I have a Subject that I want to store additional information > > about, I can just add triples using the same Subject. Easy. > > > > When I want to say things about a Statement (such as the date range > > within which the triple Statement is valid, or the strength or source > > of the relationship), the answer is more ambiguous. Reification is the > > standard answer, but it is also heavy. I've read about using Quads, > > Named Graphs, N-ary Relationships, etc. > > > > What is the current state of the art or best practice in this regard? > > > > Thanks very much, > > > > Patrick Hoeffel > > Software Engineer > > Intelligent Software Solutions (www.issinc.com<http://www.issinc.com>) > > > > > > -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web <http://like-like.xenei.com> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
