>> Le 21 nov. 2015 à 17:56, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> a écrit :
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> In the current implementation, then results will be in the same order. Well, 
>> as far as I know.  I can't think of anything that will disturb it.  I think 
>> you realise the responsibility is yours; it is not guaranteed for all time.

on the other hand, a triple store implementation that would proudly claim that 
it ensures the stability of the order of iterator results would have a 
competitive advantage over those that do not … ;-)

Thanks again. Best Regards,

fps

Reply via email to