You'll still have to clean up structures. SPIN for this is encoding the query in RDF but the rewriting of that structure needs the same (in the abstract) processing. You may be able to do it with a series of SPARQL Updates (that's speculation).

        Andy

On 29/01/16 00:26, Carlo.Allocca wrote:
Dear Martynas,


Thank you very much for your help.
At the moment, I am trying what Andy suggested.
I hope to make it. Otherwise, I will look at SPIN API.

Many Thanks,
Best Regards,
Carlo


On 28 Jan 2016, at 23:48, Martynas Jusevičius <[email protected]> wrote:

You could do it using SPIN API as well: http://spinrdf.org/sp.html

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Carlo.Allocca <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Andy,

Thank you very much for your promtly reply.

I need a little bit of exploring and thinking to apply what you suggested.
Indeed, I will look at each single info you pointed out.

I will keep this thread updated.

Many Thanks,
Best Regards,
Carlo

On 28 Jan 2016, at 18:29, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:

The approach I would take is to do this is multiple passes:

1/ remove from ElementPathBlock

2/ Look for elements that are now "empty"
e.g ElementFilter with empty
but also as there one arm of a UNION.

(2) is only one pass as the rewrite is done bottom up.


I would do this as a transformation rather than modifying the syntax tree in 
place.

org.apache.jena.sparql.syntax.syntaxtransform


See also
ElementTransformCleanGroupsOfOne

which might be helpful to understand - its doing something different though.

It might be easier to work on the algebra, it's more regular.  Then use 
OpAsQuery to turn algebnra into a Query.

I could not figure out how to remove the associated FILTER
when visit(ElementFilter el) as below.

because you need to alter the ElementUnion which holds the ElementFilter.

{...} UNION {} will include a blank row for the {} on the right hand side.

      Andy


On 28/01/16 13:14, Carlo.Allocca wrote:
Dear All,

I am using Jena for my project and I would like to submit the following 
question: How to remove consistently a triple pattern given a SPARQL query?

EXAMPLE:

For example, considering the query “qString1” and the tp=“?boss ex:isBossOf 
?ind .”
I need to remove tp from qString1, obtaining  qString1. For “Consistently”  I 
mean that the clause FILTER gets affected (as it contains var that appears in 
the triple pattern too), therefore it needs to be deleted too.

       String qString1 =
                " SELECT DISTINCT ?ind ?boss ?g where "
               + "{ "
               + " ?ind rdf:type ex:AssociatedResearcher ."
               + " {?ind rdf:type ?z. } UNION "
               + " {?boss ex:isBossOf ?ind . Filter(?boss=\”rossi\”)} "
               + "}";


       String qString2 =
                " SELECT DISTINCT ?ind ?boss ?g “
                + “WHERE "
               + "{ "
               + " ?ind rdf:type ex:AssociatedResearcher ."
               + " {?ind rdf:type ?z. } UNION "
               + " {} "
               + "}";

The solution that I am trying to implement is based on a visitor 
“SQRemoveTripleVisitor extends ElementVisitorBase”.
It is quite straightforward to remove the triple pattern when 
visit(ElementPathBlock el)

   @Override
   public void visit(ElementPathBlock el) {
       if (el == null) {
           throw new 
IllegalStateException("[SQRemoveTripleVisitor::visit(ElementPathBlock el)] The 
ElementPathBlock is null!!");
       }

       ListIterator<TriplePath> it = el.getPattern().iterator();
       while (it.hasNext()) {
           final TriplePath tp1 = it.next();

           if (this.tp != null) {
               if (this.tp.matches(tp1.asTriple())) {
                   it.remove();
               }
           }
       }

   }

I could not figure out how to remove the associated FILTER when 
visit(ElementFilter el) as below.


@Override
   public void visit(ElementFilter el) {

       //...get the variables of the FILTER expression
       Expr filterExp = el.getExpr();//.getVarsMentioned().contains(el);
       Set<Var> expVars = filterExp.getVarsMentioned();

       //...get the variables of the triple pattern that we want to delete
       Set<Var> tpVars = new HashSet();
       Node subj = this.tp.getSubject();
       if (subj.isVariable()) {
           tpVars.add((Var) subj);
       }
       Node pred = this.tp.getPredicate();
       if (pred.isVariable()) {
           tpVars.add((Var) pred);
       }
       Node obj = this.tp.getObject();
       if (obj.isVariable()) {
           tpVars.add((Var) obj);
       }

       //...check whether the FILTER expression contains any of the triple 
pattern’s variable
       for(Var var:expVars){
           //…if it does then we have to delete the entire FILTER expression
           if(tpVars.contains(var)){
               System.out.println("[SQRemoveTripleVisitor::visit(ElementFilter el)] 
I NEED TO REMOVE THE FILTER!!!!!! ");

           }
       }

   }

Please, may I ask for any help or idea on how to remove the filter?


Many Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,
Carlo


-- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt 
charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302). 
The Open University is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.





Reply via email to