2.3.1 has the following advantages which we have leveraged: - it cleanly supports persistent databases
- it has a real security module On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Steinar Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have an installation that is currently using (as near as I can tell) > Jena Fuseki 1.1, which is a bit out of date. > > Going forward, should I would it be best to replace it with Jena Fuseki > 1.3.1 or with Jena Fuseki 2.3.1? > > By best, I'm thinking of > - performance? > - In particular SPARQL query perfomance > - compatibility? > - REST endpoint compatibility? (that may be determined by the SPARQL > protocol...?) > - Directory layout compatibility? (I know this is different) > - TDB compatibility > > Thanks! > > > - Steinar > -- 73, AB1PH Don Rolph
