2016-04-15 17:02 GMT+02:00 A. Soroka <aj...@virginia.edu>:

> It's not totally clear to me what you could mean by "a way to get HTML
> format working". Do you mean some kind of RDFa templating? There's not a
> normal way to translate triples into HTML.
>
> If you could say a little more about your use case for HTML, someone might
> be able to recommend a tool or technique to use. Otherwise, Fuseki will
> return the serializations for triples that you name below (and I believe
> there may be some functionality for quads, but others would know more than
> I).
>

The general use case would be displaying data in a human friendly way. For
example when a data URI is entered in the address bar of a web browser. Or
when a data URI appears in on a web page or in a web application and a user
clicks on it.

I do not have an idea of how the data should be presented on an HTML page.
I guess it is like the SPARQL DESCRIBE response - there is some lierty in
how it can be implemented. It could be table with subject, predicate and
object columns for example. Or something like the DBPedia HTML output (e.g.
http://dbpedia.org/page/Fuseki). Something that allows some kind of
customization or templating would be great.

I hope this helps to explain what I am looking for. And I hope it is
somehow possible to have some form of HTML output.

Regards,
Frans


>
> ---
> A. Soroka
> The University of Virginia Library
>
> > On Apr 15, 2016, at 10:18 AM, Frans Knibbe <frans.kni...@geodan.nl>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have just been testing content negotiation with my new Fuseki server
> > (version 1.3.1). I tried to get data in Turtle, RDF/XML, Ntriples and
> > JSON-LD formats and that seemed to work well. However, if I request data
> to
> > be formatted in HTML ("Accept: text/html"), I receive my sample data in
> > RDF/XML format.
> >
> > Is there an overview of content types that Fuseki supports somewhere? I
> > searched but have not been able to find it.
> >
> > And is there a way to get HTML format working?
> >
> > Greetings, and thanks in advance,
> >
> > Frans
>
>

Reply via email to