Hi,
On 21/05/16 18:57, Bardo Nelgen wrote:
Hi Dave,
and thanks for the immediate response.
Mostly living in the world of markup I appear to have missed something
important here.
Would you mind pointing me to a resource further refining your remark of
There is no such property as rdf:li.
?
As of now, I only know about the frequent examples using rdf:li with the
rdf/xml serialization,
As I said in my original reply, rdf:li is a bit syntactic trickery. It
is part of the RDF/XML syntax but is not a property that actually gets
asserted in the resulting triples.
See:
https://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#section-Syntax-list-elements
Which in turn points to section 7.4 to give the (trivial) algorithm by
which the rdf:_N URIs are allocated, and see production 7.2.14 for where
in the parse of the surface syntax shortcut rdf:li is replaced by the
allocated rdf:_n URIs.
Dave
