You can prepend a string to make it a URI.
http:/example/U0000001
http:/example/user?id=U0000001
or even don't do that but allocate a unique for all time URI for this
user instance and
<urn:uuid:f2504c02-2b2b-11b2-807f-024225278a43>
user:id "U0000001" ;
foaf:name "Al Shapiro" ;
foaf:birthday "2016-07-08"^^xsd:dateTime .
and separately hold in a safe a table:
urn:uuid:f2504c02-2b2b-11b2-807f-024225278a43 PASSWORD
The user never see the URN.
Storing the password separately is for security.
URNs can be uniquely generated safely with no practical risk of
collision across multiple machines. SPARQL even has support for it.
Andy
On 08/07/16 08:26, Lorenz B. wrote:
Hello Al,
I do not understand why it is so difficult for you to generate some IRIs
for a users that have an ID. Just use your own namespace and append the
ID. And generating graphs depends on the triple store that you use. In
Jena for instance, you could use some methods of the Dataset [1], like
addNamedModel()
[1]
https://jena.apache.org/documentation/javadoc/arq/org/apache/jena/query/Dataset.html
Kind regards,
Lorenz
A. Soroka,
The syntactical form of my user id values, is a variable containing "U0000001" through
"U9999999" - the user id is assigned when an end-user first logs on to the system, with
their e-mail and password - as long as the account is valid, the end-user retains the same user id
assigned to it when they first logged on (registered)...
I still need to know how to generate the Named Graph based on IRI, etc?
Thank you,
Al
On Thursday, July 7, 2016 6:25 AM, A. Soroka <[email protected]> wrote:
What is the syntactical form of your user id values?
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
On Jul 6, 2016, at 10:14 PM, Al Shapiro <[email protected]> wrote:
Daniel,
I want to create a Named Graph "X", based on User-Id, the data for each named
Graph is created on the fly, when a Match occurs against the Default Graph (which has
already been loaded to the Jena TDB)...
I need to know how to generate the Named Graph based on IRI?
Do I create a NameSpace for the IRI?
Please give me an example...
Thank you,
Al
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 6:45 AM, Daniel Hernández <[email protected]>
wrote:
I suggest that you first translate your data to RDF using an script
(e.g., in Ruby, Python, etc.) to generate a text file in one of the RDF
serialization formats that support named graphs (e.g., nquads). Then,
you can load the data into jena using tdbloader.
Daniel
El 06/07/16 a las 01:10, Al Shapiro escribió:
Daniel,
Thank you, this gives me part of the answer...
Can you give me an example(s) of the IRI's that you used to name your Named
Graphs and how they are defined as an IRI, in Sparql?.
Please withhold any proprietary info...
Thank you again,
Al
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 9:55 PM, Daniel Hernández <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Al,
Yes, you can use any IRI to name graphs. Thus, in particular you can use
user ids to compose names of graphs.
Daniel
El 05/07/16 a las 23:58, Al Shapiro escribió:
Hi Daniel,
I am a Newbie at Jena Sparql and I would like to know how you addressed the value of each Named Graph you created, for
example, I have successfully used GRAPH qm:g1 to create a Named Graph "g1", can I substitute a variable for
"g1" such as "user _number", to create multiple Named Graphs based on the value of "user
_number"?
Thank you for help...
Al
On Monday, July 4, 2016 8:38 PM, Daniel Hernández <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Chris,
It is possible. In fact, I have loaded 57 million of named graphs and
then queried without problem. You can see the details in
http://users.dcc.uchile.cl/~dhernand/research/ssws-2015-reifying.pdf
Daniel
El 04/07/16 a las 19:21, Chris Jones escribió:
Hi All,
How many named graphs can Jena gracefully handle? Hundreds, thousands,
millions? I've found references to Jena handling large triple stores,
with billions of statements; but nothing about how many named graphs.
I'm writing a system where I'm considering giving each remote client
its own named graph where it uploads data. I'm further considering
keeping historical data, so the client would get a new named graph
each time it sent its data. I'm curious if this is a bad idea.
Chris
