Here's an unusual approach to fuzzy reasoning:
www.executable-english.com/demo_agents/Zadeh1.agent
www.executable-english.com/demo_agents/Zadeh2.agent
You can view, run and change these and other examples, and write your own.
Just point a browser to www.executable-english.com .
-- Adrian
Adrian Walker
Reengineering LLC
San Jose, CA
860 830 2085
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 3:58 AM, Luigi Selmi <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Being OWL a logic language any statement is assumed to be true. In order
> to add a probability (or fuziness) to a statement (or triple in RDF) a way
> could be to create a quadrupole and add the probability in a second triple
> <s1> <p1> <o1> // triple for original statement
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <n1><s1> <p1> <o1> //quadrupole
> <n1><:probability> 0.5
> Best,
> Luigi
> > From: [email protected]
> > Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 03:23:21 -0700
> > Subject: Vague knowledge in Ontologies
> > To: [email protected]
> >
> > How can we use the vague information, fuzzy based, in our ontologies.
> > Is it possible that we embed it into the already existed domain
> ontologies?
> > I will appreciate if some one share a working examples.
> > I have an ontology in which two of the classes needs fuzzy values like
> > useful, very useful and useless. How I will be able to do it without much
> > changes to my original ontology.
> >
> > with regards
>
>
