Håvard, 3 things: 1. You should announce this to the RDF and XML Interoperability W3C community group [1], and pursue this discussion there.
2. Were you aware of the early work on RDF schema for XML infoset? [2] 3. I agree with Martynas that XSLT is often a better way to specify and run transformations on XML. In particular, it is as easy as falling off a log to specify a transform to the above-referenced infoset schema. Regards, --Paul [1] https://www.w3.org/community/rax/ [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-xml-infoset-rdfs-20010406 On Fri, 2016-07-29 at 08:28 +0000, Håvard Mikkelsen Ottestad wrote: > Hi, > > I just wanted to give some publicity to a library I have worked on for some > time. An XML to RDF Java library (open source / apache 2) that’s compatible > with Jena. > > It’s blazingly fast and highly configurable. Available on GitHub > https://github.com/AcandoNorway/XmlToRdf and on Maven > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/no.acando/xmltordf > > Regards, > Håvard M. Ottestad
