Query returns ~15k results. I have to get all results since there is
additional filtering done in separate Lucene index afterwards. After
Lucene filter there might be 10 results left.
Also I can't replace ?child with keyword since I have to first get all
children of the selected keywords like this:
<http://www.lingsoft.fi/ontologies/ce3598292f301cec> skos:narrower* ?child
Now came to mind that I could first make the Lucene query, and add that
result as filter to this SPARQL query.
Mikael
On 16.8.2016 15:57, Osma Suominen wrote:
Hi Mikael!
Okay, so how many results does the query return in those 10 seconds?
Is it the same if you leave out the DISTINCT? Do you really need all
those results/triples in a single query result?
Does it help if you replace ?child with an actual keyword? Having an
unbound variable in there makes the query apply for all subjects
instead of a specific one.
-Osma
On 16/08/16 15:50, Mikael Pesonen wrote:
Hi Osma!
unfortunatelly I need to match those certain subjects - the application
is document search by selected keywords. And even if
?s <http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject> ?child .
is left out the search takes that ~10 seconds.
Br,
Mikael
--
www.lingsoft.fi
Speech Applications - Language Management - Translation - Reader's and Writer's
Tools - Text Tools - E-books and M-books
Mikael Pesonen
System Engineer
e-mail: [email protected]
Tel. +358 2 279 3300
Time zone: GMT+2
Helsinki Office
Eteläranta 10
FI-00130 Helsinki
FINLAND
Turku Office
Linnankatu 10 A
FI-20100 Turku
FINLAND
