---- On Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:34:10 +0200 A. Soroka <[email protected]> wrote
----
> Just for information, you might want to look at SSWAP:
>
> http://sswap.info/
> http://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2105-10-309
>
> They used OWL to assemble web services, and you might find useful ideas
> there.
Thanks, I'll have a look.
>
> Using SPARQL this way seems like an awful lot of overhead. Is there
> something particular about your data or services that lends interest to
> using SPARQL in particular?
Not sure where the overhead is in your eyes. On the one side SPARQL queries can
be generated if one doesn't want to write them manually and on the other side
it is just one query that is easy to read in my eyes. I don't have any
particular need for SPARQL. I just want to have the semantics of my software
platform expressed in linked data and SPARQL seems to be a way to do that.
