Hi Samur,
Can you report this to JIRA with a reproducible full description? I.e.
link to the data set you used, your jena-spatial index configuration,
Jena/Fuseki versions you used, and of course the query and results.
-Osma
09.01.2017, 10:16, Samur Araujo kirjoitti:
I test them all and all have the same issue.
I think there are some merging happening after accessing the index that
make it slow.
I did not look into the code to see where is the issue.
Best,
On 9 January 2017 at 09:12, Osma Suominen <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Samur,
I agree, that's really slow. I wonder if that's some kind of regression.
jena-spatial hasn't been actively worked on for a while.
Can you test with some or all of these:
- current (3.1.1) and perhaps a few previous Jena releases
- current master
- jmvanel's fork which uses Lucene 5.3.3
and see if this makes a difference?
-Osma
09.01.2017, 10:08, Samur Araujo kirjoitti:
Hi Osma, as you can see below, it makes no difference:
[2017-01-09 09:07:12] Fuseki INFO [4] POST /spatial :: 'query' ::
[application/x-www-form-urlencoded charset=utf-8] ?
[2017-01-09 09:07:12] Fuseki INFO [4] Query = PREFIX spatial: <
http://jena.apache.org/spatial#> PREFIX rdfs: <
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> SELECT distinct ?place {
?place
spatial:intersectBox (31.556 -117.128654 31.556 -117.128658) . }
[2017-01-09 09:07:16] Fuseki INFO [4] exec/select
[2017-01-09 09:07:16] Fuseki INFO [4] 200 OK (3.561 s)
[2017-01-09 09:07:21] Fuseki INFO [5] POST
http://localhost:3030/spatial/query
[2017-01-09 09:07:21] Fuseki INFO [5] POST /spatial :: 'query' ::
[application/x-www-form-urlencoded charset=utf-8] ?
[2017-01-09 09:07:21] Fuseki INFO [5] Query = PREFIX spatial: <
http://jena.apache.org/spatial#> PREFIX rdfs: <
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> SELECT ?place { ?place
spatial:intersectBox (31.556 -117.128654 31.556 -117.128658) . }
[2017-01-09 09:07:25] Fuseki INFO [5] exec/select
[2017-01-09 09:07:25] Fuseki INFO [5] 200 OK (4.350 s)
[2017-01-09 09:07:28] Fuseki INFO [6] POST
http://localhost:3030/spatial/query
[2017-01-09 09:07:28] Fuseki INFO [6] POST /spatial :: 'query' ::
[application/x-www-form-urlencoded charset=utf-8] ?
[2017-01-09 09:07:28] Fuseki INFO [6] Query = PREFIX spatial: <
http://jena.apache.org/spatial#> PREFIX rdfs: <
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> SELECT ?place { ?place
spatial:intersectBox (31.556 -117.128654 31.556 -117.128658) . }
[2017-01-09 09:07:34] Fuseki INFO [6] exec/select
[2017-01-09 09:07:34] Fuseki INFO [6] 200 OK (5.334 s)
I wonder why is so slow if the lucene index is so fast and the result set
contains only 17 resources.
On 9 January 2017 at 08:55, Osma Suominen <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Samur!
Does it help if you drop the DISTINCT?
-Osma
09.01.2017, 09:49, Samur Araujo kirjoitti:
Hi all, I noticed that jena spatial is very slow.
Query like the one below take 3s to execute (under entire geonames).
PREFIX spatial: <http://jena.apache.org/spatial#>PREFIX rdfs:
<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
SELECT distinct ?place{
?place spatial:intersectBox (32.55668 -117.12865 32.56668
-117.13865) .
}
The same query in solr/lucene takes only 20ms.
I wonder why fuseki or jena spatial is so slow.
Any clue about it?
--
Osma Suominen
D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
National Library of Finland
P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
Tel. +358 50 3199529
[email protected]
http://www.nationallibrary.fi
--
Osma Suominen
D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
National Library of Finland
P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
Tel. +358 50 3199529
[email protected]
http://www.nationallibrary.fi
--
Osma Suominen
D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist
National Library of Finland
P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
Tel. +358 50 3199529
[email protected]
http://www.nationallibrary.fi
