You said it Lorenz, I just wanted to confirm this syntax is allowed in Jena rules or not?
Thanks On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Lorenz Buehmann < [email protected]> wrote: > And trying it out is no option for you?! > > What is so confusing about greaterThan and lessThan? I'm totally puzzled > by this question as it's some kind of too obvious. > > greaterThan(?x, 1000) - what do you think does it mean? "?x is greater > than 1000" > > lessThan(?x, 2000) - what do you think does it mean? "?x is less than 2000" > > greaterThan(?x, 1000), lessThan(?x, 2000) - what do you think does it > mean? "?x is greater than 1000 AND ?x is less than 2000" > > > On 12.01.2017 20:15, tina sani wrote: > > Well, I am not sure about greaterThan and lessThan keywords. Will this > rule > > execute if it encounters salary b/w 5000 and 10,000? > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Joint <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> Have you tried it? What happened? > >> "Of course this will not execute because I skip proper syntax" > >> So you know the syntax isn't correct but still ask if it is correct.. > >> Dick > >> > >> -------- Original message -------- > >> From: tina sani <[email protected]> > >> Date: 12/01/2017 14:47 (GMT+00:00) > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Semantic Of Jena rule > >> > >> The syntax and semantic of this rule is correct? > >> > >> ?emp rdf:type URI:Employee + ?emp URI:NetSalary ?salary+ > >> greaterThan(?salary, 5000), lessThan(?salary, 10000)-> ?emp rdf:type > >> URI:Manager > >> > >> Of course this will not execute because I skip proper syntax, but I > wonder > >> this rule will work or not if some employee have salary between 5000 and > >> 10000. > >> I am confuse in greaterThan and lessThan part of the rule, if it will > work > >> or not? > >> > >
