Hi all, On my environment I have created a class in order to encapsulate access to `Dataset` and `Model`s stored. I didn't realize that the `QueryExecution` instance was not collected by the GC and it seems that could lead to memory leak. In this sense I found that `ResultSetFactory.copyResults()` detach the `ResultSet` from the QueryExecution.
My concern now now is about performance: ¿Is it really consuming to perform a copy of thousands of data? Would it be better to create another class acting as a wrapper for the Jena `QueryExecution` and just only read the `ResultSet` once. This is the kind of thing I'm referring to. ```java // query is a Query // ts is the class encapsulating the management of the triple store SparqlExecutor exec = new SparqlExecutor(query, ts); ResultSet res = exec.execute(); // Do what ever with the resultset exec.close() ``` Within the `execute` function I manage the transaction, get the corresponding named graphs, etc. Thanks a lot. Jorge P.S.: It is difficult to explain things without disclosing the code :( sorry.
