yes,

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:55 PM, A. Soroka <[email protected]> wrote:

> Can you tell us something about this project? Is this a school assignment?
>
> ---
> A. Soroka
> The University of Virginia Library
>
> > On Feb 15, 2017, at 8:54 AM, tina sani <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Lorenz, using rules in my project is mandatory part so need to stick with
> > it.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Chris Dollin <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 15 February 2017 at 13:06, tina sani <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello Lorenz, so no way to remove or replace these classes?
> >>> setOntClass also not working, I have tried it.
> >>>
> >>
> >> If you don't want inference to add back the statements
> >> you have deleted
> >>
> >> Then don't use inference to add the statements in
> >> the first place
> >>
> >> Then you can add and remove statements as you like
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Lorenz Buehmann <
> >>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> In general, you cannot remove inferred statements - those are given by
> >>>> data + rules.
> >>>>
> >>>> Indeed, you can remove statements on a materialized inferred model,
> but
> >>>> implicitly the class assertion does still exist.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 15.02.2017 13:11, tina sani wrote:
> >>>>> For example, I have added some classes for an individual using rules.
> >>>>> emplyee 1 is type of Manager, Programmer, Worker.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can I replace these classes with one class like
> >>>>> if (empl1.hasOntclass(manager) && (emp1.hasOntClass(programmer) &
> >>>>> (emp1.hasOntClass(worker)  then emp1 should be type of one class
> >>> Employee
> >>>>> and replace/remove these three classes.?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There is one method, I dont know if it is suitable here to apply?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Individual.removeOntClass(Resource)
> >>>>> <https://jena.apache.org/documentation/javadoc/jena/
> >>>> org/apache/jena/ontology/Individual.html#removeOntClass-org.apache.
> >>>> jena.rdf.model.Resource->
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to