> On Feb 28, 2017, at 11:23 AM, Osma Suominen <[email protected]> wrote: > 28.02.2017, 17:12, A. Soroka kirjoitti: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dce0d502b11891c28e57bbcbb0cdef27d8374d58d9634076b8ef4cd7@1431107516@%3Cdev.jena.apache.org%3E >> ? In other words, might it be better to factor out between -text and >> -spatial and _then_ try to upgrade the Lucene version? > > I certainly wouldn't object to that, but somebody has to volunteer to do the > actual work!
Yes, you are right, and I admit I haven't got anything like the time for it now. >> I don't use the Solr component now, but I could easily see so doing... >> that's pretty vague, I know, and I'm not in a position to do any work to >> maintain it, so consider that just a very small and blurry data point. :) > > Last time I tried it (it was a while ago) I couldn't figure out how to get it > running... If you could just try that with some toy data, then your data > point would be a lot less blurry :) I haven't used Solr for anything, so I'm > not very familiar with how to set it up, and the jena-text instructions are > pretty vague unfortunately. I will try to perform a test sometime in the next week or so. Hopefully I will at least get it running. If not, then we maybe don't need to worry about it so much! :grin: ajs6f
