That depends a good bit on what you want to say about your graphs. One way to think about this kind of question is: with whom will you want to _share_ information about your graphs? If you are just recording this for your own internal purposes and you can keep your assertions minimal (e.g. where a graph came from and a datestamp) it might be easiest to just use a few minted predicates of your own.
PROV-O: https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/#prov-o-at-a-glance is an example of a powerful but extremely general vocabulary for discussing provenance issues. There will be some overhead to using someone else's vocabulary, and that overhead is worth paying exactly to the extent that you need to share your assertions with other people. --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library > On Apr 10, 2017, at 7:12 AM, Laura Morales <laure...@mail.com> wrote: > >> You import LOV-1 and LOV-2 into different graphs, so they will have >> different graph URIs and all the quads will be distinct (even if some of >> the triples in the two graphs are the same). >> >> Dave > > Thank you. > Last question: if I'm going to make my own graph to describe what graphs I've > imported, is there any recommended schema/vocabulary that I could use?
