good afternoon; > On 2017-04-30, at 11:53, Laura Morales <[email protected]> wrote: > > Would it make sense to use GraphQL with Fuseki as a backend?
you posed the question in different terms some time ago. now, after wrangling sparql for two months, you remain unconvinced and raise the question again? there are those who take the argument further, to suggest that it would be a great service to the entire semantic data processing ecosystem for rdf store developers to support graphql. the argument is threefold 1. graphql “as-a-language” lowers the threshold to access and broadens the prospective client developer community. 2. graphql affords embedding in a wider range of development stacks and enables powerful development tools. 3. graphql is close enough to sparql on an abstract level, that the implementation effort would lie within reasonable boundaries. the arguments are all good but, so far as i am aware just one implementation has ventured around that corner. best regards, from berlin, --- james anderson | [email protected] | http://dydra.com
