try createing a multiunion graph and hen create model on that. The last time I looked the multiunion graph did not copy the data but rather made calls across the graph implementations.
Claude On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:17 AM, George News <[email protected]> wrote: > Ups I have just noticed that MultiUnion is working with Graphs and not > models :( > > Then, I'm using dataset.getNamedMode(name).getGraph(). But all my > functions expect a Model as an input. How should I proceed? > > 1) ModelFactory.createUnion() in a kind of loop, adding one model, and > then another, etc. > > 2) ModelFactory.createModelForGraph(Graph) > > I think I like a bit more the second, as this way if there is only one > graph there shouldn't be any issue. > > Any tips? > > Thanks. > > > On 2017-09-08 11:11, George News wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is multiunion only linking the graphs or copying them in a new graph? > > > > I'm thinking on splitting a huge graph on many simple ones and them > > making the union depending on the part of the main graph that has to be > > requested, therefore limiting the scope of the sparql and speeding > > things up. But if multiunion copies, then I don't think I will speed > things. > > > > Thanks > > > -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web <http://like-like.xenei.com> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
