Hello Lorenz and thank you for your information. * All the data of this resource is still located in the DBpedia dataset
If it is the case, then why we provide links to Dbpedia resource inside Protege editor? All I want to re-use the data/information of Dbpedia Its then better that we use rdfs:seeAlso and provide Dbpedia resource, like www.myOntology.org/Oxford and then use rdfs:seeAlso http:dbpedia.org/resource/Oxford Regards <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Lorenz Buehmann < [email protected]> wrote: > > The second point is if we enter individual in Protege (Create New OWL > > Individual) and then enter URI like "http:dbpedia.org/resource". > I understand. But what do you expect to be happened with this step?All > that you did is to create an OWL individual with the URI of the DBpedia > resource. All the data of this resource is still located in the DBpedia > dataset which is > a) available via RDF dumps or > b) the public DBpedia SPARQL endpoint > c) HTTP GET request according to the Linked Data priciple > > But the data is **not** in your local ontology and neither Protege nor > the built-in SPARQL plugin would have access to it. > > > > By better I mean better in general (performance, re-use).etc. Will it be > > considered a "Dbpedia resource" if we just include its URI in Protege > > editor and then query it locally like we query traditional data in > Protege > > (Ontology). > How do you query it locally? Which API, which triple store, etc? > > In general, what is the use-case? > > > > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> > > Virus-free. > > www.avast.com > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Lorenz Buehmann < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> 1. Define "better" > >> > >> 2. I don't understand what you mean by the second point ... what is an > >> "IRI editor"??? And then, how would that extract "some triples"? > >> > >> > >> As I don't know what you're asking about and to keep it short, the > >> common way to extract RDF triples from and RDF dataset is to use a > >> SPARQL CONSTRUCT query that matches those "some triples". > >> > >> > >> On 10.11.2017 17:11, Sidra shah wrote: > >>> Hello > >>> > >>> For instance, if we have to get some triples from Dbpedia, which one is > >>> better way to get? > >>> > >>> (1) Directly use Dbpedia endpoint inside application? > >>> > >>> (2) Use Ontology and use IRI editor like > dbpedia.org/resource/SOMETHING? > >>> > >>> Thank you > >>> > >> > >
