Thank you a lot Dick! Is this test for tdbloader, tdbloader2, or tdb2.tdbloader?
> 32GB DDR4 quad channel 2133 or higher? > 3 x M.2 Samsung 960 EVO Are these PCI-e disks? Or SATA? Also, what size and configuration? > Is it possible to split the index files into separate folders? > Or sym link the files, if I run the data phase, sym link, then run the index > phase? What would you gain from this? > 172K/sec 3h45m for truthy. It still feels slow considering that you throw such a powerful machine to it, but it's very interesting nonetheless! What I think after these tests, is that the larger impact here is given by the M.2 disks, and perhaps to a smaller scale by the DDR4 modules. When I tested with a xeon+ddr3-1600, it didn't seem to make any difference. It would be interesting to test with a more "mid-range setup" (iCore/xeon + DDR3) and M.2 disks. Is this something that you can try as well?
