I used "provenance" as in "where does this piece of information come from", but it looks like it has a well defined meaning so perhaps I've used the wrong term. Looks like void is closer to my use case indeed, however prov-o seems to have some interesting properties as well. Thanks for the help.
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 11:39 AM From: "Martynas Jusevičius" <marty...@atomgraph.com> To: jena-users-ml <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: Vocabulary for provenance Since you mention "provenance", PROV ontology would be one option: https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/ But your usage looks more like VoID, more specifically void:inDataset: https://www.w3.org/TR/void/#backlinks[https://www.w3.org/TR/void/#backlinks] PROV and VoID can be combined of course. On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Laura Morales <laure...@mail.com> wrote: > Which vocabulary is a good choice to describe provenance or to describe > graphs? I'd like to use something like this > > <graph-1> <name> "Graph-1" > <thisThing> <belongsToGraph> <graph-1> > > or like this > > <thisThing> <belongsToGraph> [ > <name> "Graph-1" ; > <iri> <graph-1> > ] > > there are so many vocabularies out there that I don't even know where to > start looking at. Is there anything available for this in schema.org? > Otherwise I'd like to know if there exist any vocabulary that is used by > others, and more importantly which is not abandoned or dead. > > Thanks. >