If you are not concerned about performance, why not add those prefixes client-side?
ajs6f > On Feb 25, 2018, at 4:18 PM, Laura Morales <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have several scripts from where I submit multiple queries. I submit a query > and read the results, then submit another query. But I'm not really concerned > about performance... my original question was simply about not having to deal > with PREFIXes definition, and instead instruct Fuseki to use a default list > of PREFIXes automatically. Which I think it can be a useful feature since > there are 100s of prefixes available most of which are very common (schema, > rdf, owl, pgterms, ...) > > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 9:35 PM > From: "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Use PREFIXes by default > One script == one query? Or many queries in one script? Are you using a > SPARQL library? Are HTTP connections pooled and reused? > > All theses have a major impact on request performance. Fuseki (well, Jetty) > is very good with connection management but the client has to play the game. > > > On 25 February 2018 at 19:46, Laura Morales <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> What software are you using to send the requests to Fuseki? >>> >>> I just send HTTP GET requests (from Python scripts). >> >> GET/POST >>
