Sure - will get around to it:
in the meantime, here is my current working version:
The area to work on is where/how databases are managed between docker
and host. The issue is efficiency of mmap access for TDB, especially for
non-linux host OS's. I am wondering if VOLUMEs are the way to go.
Any experiments with that would be helpful.
Andy
---------------------------
# Basic Fuseki Dockerfile.
## To do:
# VOLUME and databases
FROM java:8-jdk
LABEL maintainer="The Apache Jena community <[email protected]>"
ARG VERSION=3.9.0
ARG SRC=http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/jena/
ARG BINARY=jena-fuseki-server/${VERSION}/jena-fuseki-server-${VERSION}.jar
ENV
URL=http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/jena/jena-fuseki-server/${VERSION}/jena-fuseki-server-${VERSION}.jar
ENV BASE=/mnt/apache-fuseki
## VOLUME /mnt/
RUN mkdir -p $BASE && \
cd $BASE && \
curl --silent --show-error --output fuseki-server.jar $URL
EXPOSE 3030
ENTRYPOINT [ "/usr/bin/java", "-jar", "fuseki-server.jar" ]
## Command line arguments are those for Fuseki.
CMD []
---------------------------
On 03/11/2018 16:42, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
Andy,
can we have this WIP Dockerfile on GitHub somewhere? So we could make
pull requests and such.
Martynas
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 2:06 PM Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
The Dockerfile (which is WIP) is for running the "main" (embedded
server). My need is deployment as a triplestore service, no direct UI.
You could add FUSEKI_HOME, FUSEKI_BASE setting or add including the
"webapp" directory.
Andy
On 10/10/18 12:12, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
Andy,
I successfully built an image using your instructions.
However, I did not succeed in running it:
$ docker run --rm jena/fuseki --mem //ds
[2018-10-10 11:03:09] Server INFO Dataset: in-memory
[2018-10-10 11:03:09] Server ERROR Can't find resourceBase (tried
webapp, src/main/webapp, /./webapp and /./src/main/webapp)
[2018-10-10 11:03:09] Server ERROR Failed to start
The double dash in //ds is escaped because I'm running bash on
Windows. Also not sure why you had the -ti option there.
Is the current directory somehow off? It would probably need an
entrypoint script to be able to output or change it.
Is the Dockerfile on GitHub somewhere?
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:00 PM Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
On 03/10/18 14:58, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
What about VOLUME for data persistence?
WIP!
Send a suggested modification!
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:51 PM Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
The cycle time on a *nix distribution is long, and has a long tail. That
in turn can create costs on the project (so if people want step up ...)
A Dockerfile can be part of the release process.
A simple Dockerfile is possible - some WIP trying to be minimal:
---------------------------------------------------
# Basic Fuseki Dockerfile.
#
# Assumes:
# 1 - fuseki-server.jar
# 2 - log4j.properties
# Build: docker image build -t jena/fuseki .
# Run: docker run -it --rm jena/fuseki --mem /ds
# Add "-d" to run in the background (no stdout)
FROM openjdk:8
LABEL maintainer="The Apache Jena community <[email protected]>"
EXPOSE 3030
# Place choices of "fuseki-server.jar" and
# "log4j.properties" in the current directory
RUN mkdir /apache-jena
COPY log4j.properties /apache-jena
COPY fuseki-server.jar /apache-jena
## Run Fuseki command.
ENTRYPOINT [ \
"/usr/bin/java", "-jar", \
"-Dlog4j.configuration=file:/apache-jena/log4j.properties", \
"/apache-jena/fuseki-server.jar" \
]
## Command line arguments are those for Fuseki.
CMD []
---------------------------------------------------
Andy
On 03/10/18 14:14, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
What Docker addresses nicely is uniform deployment across different
platforms. And on top of that comes automatization, swarms etc.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 2:52 PM Laura Morales <[email protected]> wrote:
To be honest, for as long as Fuseki is not packaged in any distribution, I'd
rather compile it myself than contribute to the trend of bloated app
virtualization...
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 at 2:30 PM
From: "Martynas Jusevičius" <[email protected]>
To: jena-users-ml <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Distro package
I think Docker would be a more portable platform. Fuseki could have an
image based on this: https://hub.docker.com/r/stain/jena-fuseki/
I also think I know what the maintainers will answer: this is an
open-source project, so contributions are welcome ;)
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 2:28 PM Laura Morales <[email protected]> wrote:
Are there any plans to package jena/fuseki to Debian or other distros?
