Somehow I missed this response. If the schema and the data are in the same graph everything is fine, but I have schema and data in separate graphs.
So without putting the graphs together into a single graph is it possible, via fuseki, to update the "schema" rules in an inference graph? Even if I put the schema and the data together in a union graph and run the inferencer on that the updates still have to go to one or the other graph right? So i have to start mixing the schema and the data. Is there a way around this? If not, does anyone have any idea how hard it would be to implement an inference model that would allow updates of the schema data. I figure if that is available I can plug that into Fuseki with a couple of custom hooks and do the updates. Claude On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 1:11 PM Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 27/11/2018 16:57, Claude Warren wrote: > > I have a case using Fuseki. I have 2 named graphs call them "data" and > > "schema". Data contains all the data, schema contains all the RDFS based > > triples. > > > > I can configure Fuseki so that an inference model uses an RDF Reasoner to > > apply the "schmea" rules to the "data", call this graph "inf". In > addition > > I think fuseki can be configured so that any updates to "inf" are added > as > > triples to "data". > > > > My issue is that there are periodic updates to the "schema" (e.g. when > new > > a RDF class is created). My understanding is that the reasoners do not > > like it when you make updates to the graphs they are manipulating without > > going through the reasoner itself. So is there a way to make updates to > > the "schema" graph via fuseki such that the "inf" graph/reasoner will be > > happy? > > What happens if schema and data are in the same graph and so the updates > do go via the inference engine? > > > > > Claude > > > -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web <http://like-like.xenei.com> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
