If you have sample data, we can quickly find out :) On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 18.23, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've just added a reference to JSON2RDF in the JARQL Readme. > > The projects share the limitation of loosing the order of Arrays. But does > JSON2RDF support nested arrays? > > It would be nice to compare the RDF models. > > Cheers, > Reto > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martynas Jusevičius <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 6:12 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: JSON2RDF > > Yes indeed! I’m considering adding built-in SPARQL support as well. > > Do you know how widely it is used? > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 18.08, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Martynas, > > > > This sounds very similar to JARQL which applied the TARQL idea to JSON > > in allowing to run CONSTRUCT queries on JSON data. > > > > See: https://github.com/linked-solutions/jarql > > > > Cheers, > > Reto > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martynas Jusevičius <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 11:30 PM > > To: jena-users-ml <[email protected]> > > Subject: JSON2RDF > > > > Hi all, > > > > just wanted to let you know that in addition to CSV2RDF we've now > > published JSON2RDF: > > https://github.com/AtomGraph/JSON2RDF > > > > It's a Jena-based generic JSON2RDF converter which reads JSON and > > writes streaming N-Triples output. > > Such output is well-suited for further transformation with SPARQL > > CONSTRUCT, for vocabulary (re-)mapping, URI building, datatype fixing > etc. > > > > I think the algorithm is similar to JSON-LD but I'm not too sure. In > > any case, no @context is necessary as JSON2RDF accepts arbitrary JSON. > > > > I see JSON2RDF+CONSTRUCT as a more flexible alternative to > > JSON-LD+@context when it comes to lifting JSON data to RDF. > > > > Hope it can be useful. > > > > > > Martynas > > atomgraph.com > > >
