Never mind. The messages disappeared when I created a copy of the test w/ a 
different name?!

Sorry for the interruption,
Chris


> On Apr 22, 2020, at 12:18 PM, Chris Tomlinson <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I’m trying to test some code against 3.15.0-SNAPSHOT referring to jena-arq, 
> jena-base, jena-core, and jena-rdfconnection in an eclipse environment and 
> when I run the test app (which, btw, works fine) I get many many lines of 
> output like:
> 
>> DEBUG StatusLogger Using ShutdownCallbackRegistry class 
>> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.util.DefaultShutdownCallbackRegistry
>> DEBUG StatusLogger Not in a ServletContext environment, thus not loading 
>> WebLookup plugin.
>> DEBUG StatusLogger AsyncLogger.ThreadNameStrategy=CACHED (user specified 
>> null, default is CACHED)
>> TRACE StatusLogger Using default SystemClock for timestamps.
>> DEBUG StatusLogger org.apache.logging.log4j.core.util.SystemClock does not 
>> support precise timestamps.
>> DEBUG StatusLogger Not in a ServletContext environment, thus not loading 
>> WebLookup plugin.
>> DEBUG StatusLogger Took 0.099440 seconds to load 215 plugins from 
>> sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@6d06d69c
>> DEBUG StatusLogger PluginManager 'Converter' found 44 plugins
>> DEBUG StatusLogger Starting OutputStreamManager SYSTEM_OUT.false.false-1
>> DEBUG StatusLogger Starting LoggerContext[name=6d06d69c, 
>> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.LoggerContext@64729b1e]...
>> DEBUG StatusLogger Reconfiguration started for context[name=6d06d69c] at URI 
>> null (org.apache.logging.log4j.core.LoggerContext@64729b1e) with optional 
>> ClassLoader: null
>> DEBUG StatusLogger Not in a ServletContext environment, thus not loading 
>> WebLookup plugin.
>> DEBUG StatusLogger PluginManager 'ConfigurationFactory' found 4 plugins
> 
> at the beginning and end of the run, with the output of the test code in 
> between.
> 
> I looked through the log4j2.properties files and don’t see any DEBUG or TRACE 
> enabled.
> 
> What is the way to disable this logging?
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris
> 
> 

Reply via email to