"not to bind" to be read as "just bind once"

On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:25 PM Marco Neumann <marco.neum...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> set -Xmx to 8G and try not to bind the variable and to see if this
> alleviates the issue.
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 12:41 PM Harri Kiiskinen <harri.kiiski...@utu.fi>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm trying to run a simple update query that reads strings from one
>> graph, processes them, and stores to another:
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>   insert {
>>     graph vice:pageocrdata_clean {
>>       ?page vice:ocrtext ?ocr7 .
>>     }
>>   }
>>   where {
>>     graph vice:pageocrdata {
>>       ?page vice:ocrtext ?ocr .
>>     }
>>     bind (replace(str(?ocr),'ſ','s') as ?ocr1)
>>     bind (replace(?ocr1,'uͤ','ü') as ?ocr2)
>>     bind (replace(?ocr2,'aͤ','ä') as ?ocr3)
>>     bind (replace(?ocr3,'oͤ','ö') as ?ocr4)
>>     bind (replace(?ocr4,"[⸗—]\n",'') as ?ocr5)
>>     bind (replace(?ocr5,"\n",' ') as ?ocr6)
>>     bind (replace(?ocr6,"[ ]+",' ') as ?ocr7)
>>   }
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The source graph has some 250,000 triples that fill the WHERE criterium.
>> The strings are one to two thousand characters in length.
>>
>> I'm running the query using the Fuseki web UI, and it ends each time with
>> "Bad Request (#400) Java heap space". The fuseki log does not show any
>> error except for the Bad Request #400. I'm quite surprised by this problem,
>> because the update operation is a simple and straightforward data
>> processing, with no ordering etc.
>>
>> I started with -Xmx2G, but even increasing the heap to -Xmx12G only
>> increases the time it takes for Fuseki to return the same error.
>>
>> Is there something wrong with the SPARQL above? Is there something that
>> increases the memory use unnecessarily?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Harri Kiiskinen
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> ---
> Marco Neumann
> KONA
>
>

-- 


---
Marco Neumann
KONA

Reply via email to