Hello I have to use limit and offset on a sparql query run on Jena Fuseki to get paginated results.
But reading the w3c documentation I find: _"OFFSET CAUSES GENERATED SOLUTIONS TO START AFTER THE SPECIFIED NUMBER OF SOLUTIONS. AN OFFSET OF ZERO HAS NO EFFECT._ _USING LIMIT AND OFFSET TO SELECT DIFFERENT SUBSETS OF QUERY SOLUTIONS WILL NOT BE USEFUL UNLESS THE ORDER IS MADE PREDICTABLE USING ORDER BY "._ Also on stackoverflow there are the same indications: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55146844/offset-in-sparql However, assuming there will be _NO UPDATES_ on the dataset but only reads, can I avoid the ORDER BY clause? I have done various tests without ORDER BY and the results seem consistent. I would like to avoid the ORDER BY clause because I slow down the query a lot. Thanks Con Tiscali Mobile Smart 70 hai 70 GB in 4G, minuti illimitati e 100 SMS a soli 7,99€ al mese http://tisca.li/Smart70
