Hi, Are the output "flavors" for JSON-LD 1.0 only then? https://jena.apache.org/documentation/io/rdf-output.html#json-ld
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:39 AM Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > Jena has both JSON 1.0, provided by jsonld-java, and JSON-LD 1.1, > provided by Titanium. > > What should the default settings be? > > For parsing that means what is bound to "application/ld+json" and file > extension .jsonld. > > For writing, it means what is setup for Lang.JSONLD. > > This is two decisions - parsing and writing can be different. > > > But. > > It is not so simple: > > 1/ For Java11, the default settings for java.net.http can't contact > schema.org. > > This is not a problem with Titanium. > > See example code that uses only the plain java.net.http package. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2306 > > HTTP/2 works for java 17.0.2, but does not work for java 11.0.14. > > And that means { "@context": "https://schema.org/"; } does not work. > > (http: redirects to that as well) > > This _may_ be: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8218546 > > in which case it is fixed in java 11.0.15. > > In my testing, it wasn't just google HTTP/2 sites. > > ** Please try the example code and report the Java version and what happens. > > 2/ Jena is writing JSON-LD 1.1 without much in the way of transformation > nor creating a @context from the RDF data. It prints full URIs; numbers > aren't abbreviated etc etc. so it not very pretty. > > Or should Jena only write some plain output and expect the application > to further transform it? > > Even for this, it needs some improvement so that there is a @context to > work from. > > ** Can you contribute here? The code is in JsonLD11Writer.java. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2153 > > Andy
