Queries don't have common enough selection criteria so they have to executed separately. Otherwise that would be nice solution.
On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 at 11:12, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you put all the changes in one update request, they will be done > atomically. > > DELETE { ... } WHERE { ... } > ; > INSERT DATA { ... } > > Also, the WHERE clause in a DELETE-INSERT-WHERE can be used to "switch > off" an operation. > > Andy > > On 24/03/2022 13:17, Mikael Pesonen wrote: > > > > We have occasionally an issue with replace where inserting new data may > > fail after old data has been deleted. What is the recommended way to do > > this kind of multipart SPARQL with Fuseki (not java)? First option comes > > to mind is to test if SPARQL insert is correct and WOULD be executed. Is > > this possible? > > >
