Hi, After upgrading from 4.3.2 to 4.5.0, some of our RDF writing code started failing.
It seems that this is due to RDFLanguages.isTriples(Lang.SHACLC) returning true, which messes up our content negotiation as it attempts to write Models as SHACLC. Can this be rectified? The RDFLanguages registry is a bit of an oxymoron in general. Right now it's a bag of all sorts of syntaxes Jena supports, half of which are not even "RDF languages". We need to iterate and filter the languages just to know which ones can be used to read/write Models, which can be used for ResultSets etc.: https://github.com/AtomGraph/Core/blob/master/src/main/java/com/atomgraph/core/MediaTypes.java#L86 Wouldn't it make sense to have separate registries depending on the entity types they apply to? Thanks. Martynas
