Thanks Øyvind, that looks promising.
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 11:58 AM Øyvind Gjesdal <oyvin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I haven't tried it, but it looks like it is implemented, and you can > configure a SHACL service on datasets, in the assembler for Fuseki. > https://jena.apache.org/documentation/shacl/#integration-with-apache-jena-fuseki > > > You can then use the api and post shapes as files for validating datasets: > > The example from the documentation : > > curl -XPOST --data-binary @fu-shapes.ttl \ > --header 'Content-type: text/turtle' \ > 'http://localhost:3030/ds/shacl?graph=default' > > Best regards, > Øyvind > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 11:27 AM Martynas Jusevičius <marty...@atomgraph.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > What is the approach to validating data stored in Fuseki with SHACL? > > Without having to retrieve a data dump first. > > > > I have found some generic projects that claim to translate SHACL to SPARQL: > > https://github.com/rdfshapes/shacl-sparql > > https://github.com/Shape-Fragments/SHACL2SPARQL > > Has anyone had any luck with them? > > > > I was wondering if a Jena-based solution would be feasible and what > > would it take. > > > > > > Martynas > >
