Sorry, I meant this:
CONSTRUCT { ?s ?p ?o . } WHERE { ?s ?p ?o ; <http://purl.org/dc/terms/title> "the message" } On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:23 PM Martynas Jusevičius <marty...@atomgraph.com> wrote: > > No syntax issue, but with ?o being not bound the ?s ?p ?o triple will > not be constructed. > > This might or might not be what you are looking for: > > CONSTRUCT > { > ?s ?p ?o . > } > WHERE > { ?s <http://purl.org/dc/terms/title> ?o ; > <http://purl.org/dc/terms/title> "the message" > } > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:13 PM Hashim Khan <engr.hashimwa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Thanks for the quick response. I would ask if you write the exact query > > please. By, ?o not bound, you mean that we can not execute such a > > construct query? Or is there a syntax issue? > > > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:04 PM Martynas Jusevičius > > <marty...@atomgraph.com> > > wrote: > > > > > ?o is not bound in your WHERE pattern. > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 11:50 AM Hashim Khan <engr.hashimwa...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > ./rsparql --service http://localhost:8890/sparql --query query.sparql > > > > --results=ntriples I want to save the triples in NT format as returned > > > > by > > > > the construct query given here. > > > > CONSTRUCT {?s ?p ?o} WHERE { > > > > ?s <http://purl.org/dc/terms/title> 'the message' . > > > > } > > > > > > > > I have run this query with SELECT and it has many triples, but when I > > > want > > > > to construct them, then I can not see the effect. It takes about two > > > > seconds but neither output.nt file generates, nor I see any triples. If > > > > anyone please tell me the exact query to accomplish this job. > > > > > > > > best regards > > > > -- > > > > *Hashim Khan* > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Hashim Khan*