Hello This is 3.17.0. Pretty old, due to other dependency with TopQuadrant SHACL API.
Thomas Le sam. 20 avr. 2024 à 18:06, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> a écrit : > Hi Thomas, > > Which version of Jena is this? > > Andy > > On 19/04/2024 17:18, Thomas Francart wrote: > > Hello > > > > The RDF/XML parsing of the following succeeds: > > > > <rdf:Description> > > > > <epvoc:decisionAboutId rdf:parseType="literal"><am><reference><symbol > href=" > > https://xx.xx.xx/PC"/></reference></am></epvoc:decisionAboutId> > > > > </rdf:Description> > > > > while the RDF/XML parsing of this gives an error : in that case the XML > has > > simply be encoded with <, and > and the rdf:datatype has been > > explicitly set to XMLLiteral : > > > > <rdf:Description> > > > > <epvoc:decisionAboutId rdf:datatype=" > > http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral > "><am><reference><symbol > > href="https://xx.xx.xx/PC > > "/></reference></am></epvoc:decisionAboutId> > > > > </rdf:Description> > > > > > > The error is > > > > 13:08:04.742 WARN org.apache.jena.riot - Lexical form > > '<am><reference><symbol href="https://xx.xx.xx/PC"/></reference></am>' > not > > valid for datatype XSD XMLLiteral > > > > and then further down in SPARQL queries: > > > > 13:08:04.775 WARN o.apache.jena.sparql.expr.NodeValue - Datatype format > > exception: "<am><reference><symbol href=\"https://xx.xx.xx/PC\ > > "/></reference></am>"^^rdf:XMLLiteral > > > > The encoded XML is however valid. > > > > Is it possible to explicitely create literals with XMLLiteral datatype in > > RDF/XML by setting this datatype explicitely ? > > > > Thanks > > Thomas > > > > > -- *Thomas Francart* -* SPARNA* Web de *données* | Architecture de l'*information* | Accès aux *connaissances* blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin : fr.linkedin.com/in/thomasfrancart tel : +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97, skype : francartthomas
